Skip to main content
For dance studios

Terms, not drop-ins.

Multi-week courses, recital season, family accounts and parents who pay for three children in two disciplines — modeled properly instead of worked around.

What it’s actually like

Three things generic booking software gets wrong about dance.

01
A term is not eight drop-ins

You sell a twelve-week course. Software built for drop-in classes makes you fake it as twelve separate bookings.

Enrollment sits on the course. A missed week doesn't cost the family a second payment.
02
One parent, three dancers

Fees, permissions and communication all belong to the adult. The classes belong to the children.

The payer and the participants are modeled separately, so one account covers the whole family.
03
Recital season is a spreadsheet

Costume sizes, extra rehearsals, ticketed showcases — none of it fits a weekly class grid.

Workshops, events and ticketed showcases run on the same spine as your regular timetable.
The part nobody trained you for

Registration week shouldn't need a paper diary.

Most dance studios still run enrollment on forms and a desk diary, because the alternative was software that couldn't hold a term. That's a modelling failure, not a discipline failure.

Course enrollment with per-session overrides
Family accounts where the payer isn't the participant
Waitlists that promote in enrollment order
Ticketed showcases alongside classes
[Proof: pending — quote from a pilot dance studio, to replace this placeholder before launch.]
Studio owner
[Proof: pending — pilot studio owner]
Owner · dance academy

Run the term.
Not the paperwork.

Request early access
Free during early access. Import from your current tool in under an hour.